Strengths And Weaknesses Of Oral Tradition Pdf

File Name: strengths and weaknesses of oral tradition .zip
Size: 1269Kb
Published: 25.05.2021

1: Historiography and Historical Skills

African and Africanist historians have professed the value and reliability of oral traditions for the reconstruction of the history of African peoples. Their weaknesses as a source of historical reconstruction have been argued as no worse than those of other sources of history, including written records. Various processes have been developed for the mitigation of these weaknesses by the methodical gathering and treatment of oral traditions. This has also involved the conceptualization of oral tradition and the classification of the genres that make up oral traditions. Each of these typologies has peculiar treatment types. Oral traditions, among many African peoples, are more complex, better-organized forms of recording history than the stories and legends of some other preliterate societies.

S1: History and Citizenship

Using the internet and a dictionary, research on the definitions of History. You probably remember your childhood friend you liked playing with. You may also remember your first day in school. Some people may remember the name of their first class teachers. Such a collection of information about our past forms our history.

Please click this link to download the chapter. Some of the beliefs and institutions of the past may seem alien to us, others may also seem too familiar. But in either case, when we study the people of the past, what we are really learning about is the rich diversity of human experience. The study of history, however, is the study of the beliefs and desires, practices and institutions of human beings. African history is the study of the past institutions and cultures of the people who live in Africa.

Alessandro Portelli once said To speak is to preserve the teller from oblivion. Portelli is trying to explain how important the documentation of people's lives through the spoken word is. Without this form of history the true voice of people and groups of people would disappear forever and that would be a crime. Since the very beginning of time humans have told stories, sang songs and recited poems to convey experiences of themselves or people from the past, this process of distributing wisdom is quintessentially in every person in the world. Thus as a result historians have ceased upon this opportunity to understand the past more accurately through what may be considered as a biographical interview and so since the 's when this started to be used as a research tool the techniques have been refined to include a set of moral standards and techniques which allow the interviewer to extract more information from the interviewee. Although this research method has been around since the 40's it is still a new method in collecting historical data and therefore has had criticisms directed at it from more traditional academic historians. The main disapproval of Oral History as a research method has always been memory and how it can discredit the interviewees story.


What are the strengths and weaknesses of oral histo-. • ries as primary sources? OAH Magazine of History (spring ): 3–5. PDF cop- ies can be found at.


Download Strengths And Weaknesses Of Oral History As A Research Method

Post a comment. Missionaries came to East Africa for various reasons. These were economic, social, and humanitarian in nature. The missionaries had the ambition to spread Christianity to the people of East Africa. Stanley, Dr.

Oral communication has several advantages and disadvantages, compared to written communication, which has several advantages too and a few disadvantages. When we look at the way these two types of communication, in relation to our day to day lives interrelate with each other, and then basic communication skills will be much more efficient and effective. Looking first at the advantages and disadvantages of the oral communication, we will know more about it. For its good side, this kind of communication is less time consuming as compared to written communication.

By interviewing people who have memories of the past or who retain recollections given to them by members of older generations we have a potentially very productive way of discovering and preserving the history of parish congregations and communities. By conducting interviews with long-standing members of churches and communities we can add significant dimensions to our understanding of the past. Oral history can be lots of fun for the researcher, a great way of involving others in the research process and an invaluable means of preserving and remembering the history of the church or congregation. Although it is important to be aware of the potential pitfalls described above, oral history is still an excellent way of finding out information about a church or community.

Strengths and Weaknesses of Oral History as a Research Method

There are obvious problems with the use of oral traditions.

 - Я попросил Фонтейна передать его наследникам Танкадо.  - Он взял ее руку и натянул что-то на палец. - Лжец, - засмеялась Сьюзан, открывая.  - Я же угада… - Но она замолкла на полуслове. На ее пальце было не кольцо Танкадо.

Она посмотрела на него, потом на кольцо. Глаза ее увлажнились.

4 Response
  1. Guy B.

    Oral tradition offers the advantages of inducing open communication and verifiable first-hand knowledge of events from a historical reference point.

  2. Evie S.

    Building web services with java making sense of xml pdf difference between human capital management and human resource management pdf

  3. Paciente L.

    Strengths and Weaknesses of Oral History as a Research Method - Free download as Word Doc .doc /.docx), PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or.

Leave a Reply